SpyTHINK 086: Barely Thought Thru: Back to the Future's 9/11 Warnings

Brilliant YOUTUBE documentarian Barelyhuman11's extremely alarming and disturbing documentary on the secret 9/11 foretelling in the 1985 hit movie, "Back to the Future" deserves a serious and in-depth scrutiny and later action.  

www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY

Satanic Symbology to Magically Bless Your Film Understandable in Hollywood When You Only as Good as Your Last Hit Movie

The following learned by me researching this subject is hard to believe--but true.

Steven Spielberg--is arguably the GREATEST FILM MAKER, OF ALL TIME, EVER--that's right, EVER. Yes, he is obsessed with glorifying demons as cuddly ETs and all that. Total evil BS. However, no one makes movies more visually stunning and emotionally moving than Spielberg--Kubrick could at times surpass him visually--but not emotionally at the same time.

Yet....

Here in the early 1980s the great Spielberg (Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark, ET, Close Encounters) is not just discredited, he is looked on as a film industry leper for a mere 2 movies that flopped? Who the-F is this upstart Zemeckis to even treat Spielberg with disdain when he hadn't even done jack-s himself?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_to_the_Future

The two were tempted to ally themselves with Steven Spielberg, who produced Used Cars and I Wanna Hold Your Hand, which both flopped. Spielberg was initially absent from the project because Zemeckis felt if he produced another flop under him, he would never be able to make another film. Gale said "we were afraid that we would get the reputation that we were two guys who could only get a job because we were pals with Steven Spielberg."[12] One producer was interested, but changed his mind when he learned Spielberg was not involved. Zemeckis chose to direct Romancing the Stone instead, which was a box office success. Now a high-profile director, Zemeckis approached Spielberg with the concept, and the project was set up at Universal Pictures.[8]

**********

WTFO? Who-the-F is Gale?

Never heard of him until just now. Sorry, Bob.

The point of all of this is--if in the Illuminati's Movie Mill a Spielberg could become persona non grata after just 2 flop films; then its not surprising at all that Hollywood packs in every sick, demented Satanic symbol they can cram into every scene of of everyone one of their movies to get the magic of evil supporting their works of darkness. Its must be a commonly-understood-by-everyone PRIME DIRECTIVE to CRAM IN EVERY SATANIC, LUCIFERIAN SYMBOLISM YOU CAN IN EVERY SCENE, EVERYWHERE. In fact, murdered Illuminati whistle-blower John Todd told us in church in the late 1970s that every consumer product has all sorts of Satanic symbology embedded into logos and packaging art work etc. to "bless off" on it for maximum sales from the compliant sheeple within the hive. 

However, the smug lack of decency, respect and gratitude by the up-start punks Zemeckis and Gale revealed in the noted establishment-supported Wikipedia description is also intolerable and smacks of raw penis envy. Its one thing to believe in yourself and all that, but to absurdly disrespect an obviously GREAT GENIUS is just flat-out uncalled for. I take it that Zemeckis & Gale "resurrected" Spielberg by "rehabilitating" his movie career with Back to the Future (BTTF) in 1985.    

Barelyhuman11's Brilliant Research Not Brought to its Logical Conclusions

BH research does NOT just reveal Satanic decorative icing within BTTF to bless off its project as some gratuitous sex and violence is often thrown on screen; A CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD 9/11 LIKE LITERAL WTC BUILDING COLLAPSE IS SHOWN in the future McFly home dad-upside-down scene. The previous time travel scenes where the "Twin Pines" shopping mall that becomes the satirical "Lone Pine" shopping mall are very troubling as they have no justification from the organic plot action for it, but they are mostly SYMBOLIC not literal. The film makers could hide if confronted with the illogical shopping mall name changing by lying that they had to name the mall something implying there is no hidden embedded meaning, but then why did the name change? why not keep calling the mall the "Twin Pines" mall when certainly the town still had more than 1 tree in its possession?

Let's Take a Thought Experiment Journey...

The future McFly upside scene has no such weasel-out escape path. It is EXTREMELY DISTURBING because not only does it mean that Zemeckis, Gale and Spielberg know exactly that it means the WTC towers would be imploded at a future date by the Illuminati, they consciously decided to show it to the world and deliberately--by choice--at the same time chose to hide it to save their hides from Illuminati murder by having it only decodable by the audience turning their heads to look at the scene upside down to see the WTC towers collapsing in the allegedly defective TV set.  

Wow.

Just ponder the ramifications of the above reality.

Experiment Trial Run #1

First, let's say Zemeckis, Gale & Spielberg (ZGS) sounds like a law firm, doesn't it?---did not know the YEAR the WTC towers were going to be publicly imploded. That means on September 11, 1986 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1987 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1988 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1989 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1990 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1991 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1992 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1993 ZGS looked for the event--probably alarmed by the failed WTC bombing that year. 

September 11, 1994 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1995 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1996 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1997 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1998 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 1999 ZGS looked for the event.

September 11, 2000 ZGS looked for the event.

THEN--it happened.

On September 11, 2001 what did ZSG think and do when their previously-revealed ROTM warning was obviously ignored by the sheeple and 3, 000 people were murdered?

Did they feel disgust? Sadness? Anger at the sheeple for being so stupid to ignore their warnings?

Did they put the coded 9/11 message in as a heroic SECRET WARNING or a ROTM mockery of the sheeple to guarantee its phenomenal success and popularity?

SOMEONE SHOULD CLEVERLY ASK ZSG--INDIVIDUALLY--these questions.

Experiment Trial Run #2

OK, that went well.

What if ZGS knew the year as well as the date. No waiting each year but an ominous clock-ticking in the back of their minds. Let's say with their newly found decency and respect for eachother, they met for drinks at a LA night club in the first year in the new Millenium.

Steven remarks: "Hey you guys, NEXT YEAR is the year."

They all take a sip of champagne.

Zemeckis nods. "Next year will be a real barn-burner."

Gale laughs.

"They won't even see it coming!"

They all toast and clink their glasses together.

Or...perhaps they are somehow NOT Illuminati psycho-sociopaths who were trying to warn the sheeple without getting themselves killed?

If so, why didn't they discretely start a rumor to watch BTTF carefully for hidden messages say in a new Director's Cut DVD?

Now Back to the Futu--ehhh Past, 1985.

Its 1985. ZGS has revised their BTTF script several times since 1981.

WHERE IN THE-F DID THEY GET THE IDEA TO FORETELL 9/11?

Was it in their heads in their mind's eye during the script or did it get added in later as a movie production "value" (I use word loosely) thrown in?

Are ZGS members of some or several SECRET SOCIETIES?

Like director Mel Brooks who did a ROTM on his "Get Smart!" TV series; "The Walls of Jericho"...about pre-planted explosives bringing a skycraper down...

You can almost bank on it.

So here are 3 Hollywood insiders struggling to make a picture and they get the needed backing by of course going along with the Illuminati agenda. The question remains if the LITERAL future McFly scene was heroic public service warning or just a sick ROTM joke they were compelled to make to mock the sheeple?

Another possible source for the 9/11 predictive programming is the infamous CIA bureaucracy--a corrupt and vil INTELLIGENCE AGENCY that throws tax paper money around Hollywood to meddle in domestic affairs illegally. Witness the trouble EON Productions had getting money for Bond #23 after Quantum of Solace took justified shots at the crap CIA. 

We know Kubrick was a Kaballist secret society member who tried to warn us of 9/11 in his almost patently obvious "2001: A WTC Tower Burns", oops I mean "Space Oddessy" movie in 1969:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlpZwB3K2jg

What Can We Do About This?

Must I "spell" it out?

Someone should meet ZGS and compel them to talk about this stuff.

Another group would be the people who helped make BTTF, see if any of them are profiles in courage or sheeple wanting a paycheck from the Illuminati hive?

Here's some expert feedback....

Agent UNCLE 00 Says:

"Random thoughts:  I think the Illuminati doesn't see themselves as evil.  I think they feel somehow 'obliged' to reveal what they plan to do.  Georgia Guidestones, etc.  The smart ones can use this info to their advantage---that is their thinking.  Eliminate the sheeple, cull the herd, let the cream rise to the top.

My gut feeling is that Spielberg rubs shoulders with them and picks their brain.  He is definitely privy to inside info.  How 'evil' he is, I am not sure.  I think he is being used to disseminate information.  He may have good intentions; if he presses too much, Kubrick outcome; he is kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place.  He doesn't have a lot of wiggle room in some areas I would guess.

Used Cars was great, by the way!  You never know what will be a hit.  Spielberg was just a producer on that.  He produced 'Eurotrip' too.  Not what you would expect---a great Hitler scene!  Spielberg must do a certain number of propaganda films and then some films that reveal.  'Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull' is a total reveal.  The Transformer series is just loaded with reveal.

ET---marching orders: get people used to friendly 'others'

Transformers---'they' are not all good

I'll have to watch 'Back to the Future' again.  Now they have cars that run on salt water, the Quant....complete with a James Bond-style commercial....

www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrLyR5nmmb0

James Bond is REAL.

www.jamesbondisforreal.com  

NOTES

There is a throw-away gag scene not critical to the plot, in BTTF where Marty tries to con the 1955 people that he was an ET from another planet rather than reveal he is a time traveler from the future.

http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/05/note-on-mighty-wurlitzer.html#Mining-Propaganda

For instance, on the CIA memo reproduced by Cooper which speaks of using UFO/Aliens mantra for psychological warfare, a topic which I have analyzed and written about and reached exactly the same conclusions as independently reached by the article and confirmed by that CIA memo, I wondered who this Walter B. Smith, Director of CIA was. And O boy, wikipedia has a very intriguing bio such that the memo signed by him is entirely believable. But did General Walter Bedell Smith of the United States Army, as the Director of CIA between 1950 and 1953, indeed write such a memo which bears his name for secret communication or for later public consumption as a limited hangout? If the former, why on earth was it ever declassified and released to the public? This memo directly substantiates, for instance, all that I analyzed and concluded here a few years ago:

http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/p/alien-agenda.html

PIC

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-RN5cbq2mZ-c/U4RAhI-IgOI/AAAAAAAAAMA/yxn1k9H5BO8/s1600/cia-memo-walter-b-smith-aliens-as-psyops-ciadoc-via-hourofthetime.gif

CIA Memo

Memorandum To: Director, Psychological Strategy Board

Subject: Flying Saucers

1. I am today transmitting to the National Security Council a proposal (TAB A) in which it is concluded that the problems connected with unidentified flying objects appear to have implications for psychological warfare as well as for intelligence and operations.

2. The background for this view is presented in some detail in TAB B.

3. I suggest that we discuss at an early board meeting the possible offensive or defensive utilization of these phenomena for psychological warfare purposes.

Walter B. Smith

Director


Comments