SpyTHINK 030: "More Perfect UNION" Does NOT Mean LONERISM
Blame Group Crimes on Loner Individuals!
The 1st thing God, our Creator did after creating Adam the Man was to create Eve, the Woman because 1--being alone--LONERISM---is NOT GOOD. If God insists on 1 is one and 2 are 1 then where do the Simon Says! following sheeple get off glorifying the French ENLIGHTENMENT LIE that all man are created equal when they damn well are not and that America doesn't need an organized UNION but can somehow get by with every-man-for-himself, DIY lonerism? The ruling class evil, Satanic Illuminati know that 1 man is easily defeated and dismissed and keep pushing the LONERISM LIE to the sheeple so they don't get organized and remove them from rule.
Did Lindberg build the Spirit of St. Louis airplane he flew solo across the Atlantic? No, RYAN AIRCRAFT COMPANY--a corporation--a GROUP OF PEOPLE built it. The plane was not called the "Spirit of Lindberg" was it? The Wright Brothers--a duo--a team--a pair of men created the Heavier-than-Air airplane in the post-Flood era.
I am frankly sick & fucking tired of the James Bond movie makers recently & constantly showing 007 without any back-ups and when he has a side-kick having them get killed. In SPECTRE M, Tanner, Moneypenny couldn't fucking fire back? Why? because we have to constantly show Daniel Craig as bad-ass when he's really a STUPID ass if he has no Quick Reaction Force (QRF) help. Fleming constantly had Felix Leiter helping him--and the Bond girl joining in on the adventure--why has Jeffrey Wright not been faithfully utilized yet?
This lie of LONERISM driving the world is a convenient excuse for the lazy, irresponsible hedonist and immoral stoical sheeple to sit on their asses and do nothing to fix our 1787 U.S. Constitution (USC) UNION when a group of evil men took over America in 1945 and has since then created a MILINDCOMP that group ambush murdered POTUS JFK in 1963; when the fake Cuban Marxist ties to Red Herring patsy Oswald failed to stir the sheeple to invade Cuba to regain gambling casinos, guilty monster illegetimate POTUS LBJ redirected blame to Oswald alone--when nothing about him was done "alone".
American sheeple don't give-a-fuck about factual details.
The 1st Foundation of JUSTice is JUSTness
George Floyd was a drug addict, violent criminal thug, hedonist--notice when the Illuminati doesn't want to pontificate on the individual because he was a scumbag and in the wong--he suddenly becomes a symbol of all American black people. No, he does not. He was an individual caught trying to buy cigarettes for his hedonistic habit with counterfeit money instead of earning it. Bad cops tired of his resisting arrest choked him to death. Floyd was an individual living in the city of Minneapolis; his murder is none of your business if you don't live there and all those that do live there's responsibility to fix. Fixing one man's death does NOT JUSTify thousands of buildings being destroyed, looted/robbed, and doxens of people being murdered.
JUSTness means the corrective action matching the crime's severity---the looting/robberies of thousands of people does NOT equal the crime. It's an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth--NOT 1000xs of crimes for 1x life's murder. The rioting/looting/vandalizing/murdering of black hedonists is proof they are low lives driven by selfish, impulsive criminal urges and lack stoical morality--certainly dating back to their moral panic in 1968 after Dr. MLK was murdered by the Illuminati MILINDCOMP. Even though the King family has proven in Federal Court the USG MILINDCOMP cabal murdered MLK, they say NOTHING about DISBANDING THE CIA, FBI, that DID THE CRIME. Instead they whine endlessly about white sheeple who don't fight back.
So unless you live in Minneapolis, STFU about George Floyd.
If you are a hedonistic low-life justing itching for an excuse to riot/loot/vandalize/murder, STFU about "JUSTice" since you don't know what JUSTness is aka proportionality a word probably too big to know its meaning if one's life is centered on pleasure instead of learning.
1 Man Can Make a Difference--IF He/She Can Get a Following
Why do you think FECESBOOK and other Illuminati-controlled Socialist/Fascist media go out of their way to censor charismatic posters to try to control the Political Theater leading up to the 2020 POTUS election? POTUS Trump has changed the world forever for the better making it rock-fucking-clear the DEEP STATE Illuminati exist and they are running the world--including America to ruin.
If Americans don't get off their asses and amend the USC and remove all secret society members from all and any USG positions, then America will continue to fall apart into destruction.
The American LONER LIE is Over.
Enough.
Enough pretending we don't know ANYTHING about life and can't make a damn fucking values decision--lest we cross some losertard individual.
America no longer has a rural economy where families can be self-sufficient; Illuminati corporations hate sheeple and do not offer family wages.
THEY WANT US ALL DEAD.
About 6 billion out of 7 billion D-E-A-D.
Thus, the Horatio Alger LONER LIE that all America needs is every individual to pull him/herself up by their boot straps when there are no boots to pull on is OVER.
The current American fuck-you-you-are-on-your-own, selfish, cut-throat competitive alleged "FREE MARKET" system does NOT build moral stoical character in our people.
America has 3x choice for a socio-economic-political fabric:
Immoral Hedonism in Ever-Shrinking Socialist Sharing Economy (like 3rd World Country sweat shops of Type B sheeple)
Moral Stoicism built on a Baseline of Civilized Behavior (BCB) like the last 5x of the 10x Commandments, Life Skills in High School and 2 Years of National Service, corporations must pay at least LIVING if not FAMILY wages (Israel, Switzerland)
Immoral Stoicism anarchy markets aka Fascism of Type As robbing foreign lands with endless war rackets instigated by MILINDCOMP (Nazi Germany)
https://www.lanl.gov/museum/news/newsletter/2017/2017-3/alger-myth-nr.php
Newsletter » March 2017 » Horatio Alger
At the Bradbury
Science versus the ‘Horatio Alger myth’
The work stems from Los Alamos research into computational material science, with broader applications to materials physics, energy security and weapons physics.
Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists have taken a condensed matter physics concept usually applied to the way substances such as ice freeze, called “frustration,” and applied it to a simple social network model of frustrated components.
Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists have taken a condensed matter physics concept usually applied to the way substances such as ice freeze, called “frustration,” and applied it to a simple social network model of frustrated components.
“Most theories of wealth inequality rely on social stratification due to income inequality and inheritance,” said Cristiano Nisoli.
In a new study published today in the journal PLOS ONE, Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists have taken a condensed matter physics concept usually applied to the way substances such as ice freeze, called “frustration,” and applied it to a simple social network model of frustrated components. They show that inequality of wealth can emerge spontaneously and more equality can be gained by pure initiative.
It’s a computer-modeling exploration of the 19th-century Horatio Alger theme, whereby a motivated young person overcomes poor beginnings and lives the “rags to riches” life thanks to strength of character. “Most theories of wealth inequality rely on social stratification due to income inequality and inheritance,” said Cristiano Nisoli, of the Physics of Condensed Matter and Complex Systems group at Los Alamos and lead author of the study. “We consider, however, the possibility that in our more economically fluid world, novel, direct channels for wealth transfer could be available, especially for financial wealth.”
The work stems from Los Alamos research into computational material science, with broader applications to materials physics, energy security and weapons physics. In this case, the study’s authors used computer modeling to conceptualize the situation of a set of agents, endowed with opportunities to acquire available wealth. As Nisoli describes it, “we assume that the possession of wealth endows the user with the power to attract more wealth.”
The team of Benoit Mahault (visiting from Université Paris Saclay), Avadh Saxena and Nisoli divided the problem into three sets of problems:
The first set of results shows that in a static society—where the allocation of opportunities does not change in time—the “law of the jungle” allows anyone to gain wealth from or lose it to anyone else. Relative chaos ensues.
The second set of results also pertains to static societies, but ones in which transactions of wealth are regulated. People cannot gain or lose wealth from just anybody, but only from their neighbors in the network in which they are linked. This scenario leads to substantially more fairness in the mathematical benchmark cases of Erdös models for random networks and of Barabasi-Albert algorithms for scale-free networks. However, marked differences between the two appear when it comes to overall rather than subjective fairness.
The third set of results pertains to dynamic societies. Maintaining the overall wealth level as fixed, the researchers allow agents to freely shift links among themselves as their own initiative drives them. This is where the concepts of power, frustration and initiative, previously benchmarked on static markets, become crucial. Their interplay results in a complex dynamic. At a low level of initiative, results converge to more or less ameliorated inequality where the power of wealth concentrates and wins.
Said Nisoli, “If driven by power alone, the market evolution reaches a static equilibrium characterized by the most savage inequality. Power not only concentrates wealth, but reshapes the market topology to concentrate the very opportunities to acquire wealth on only a few agents, who now amass all the wealth of the society.”
****
A James Bond Tale of a Lost Q Gadget
The following events are a microcosm of why America needs to be made great again--and why the Chinese are out-producing us.
In 2013, I dropped my selfphonecamera onto hard concrete while taking pictures at our shooting range, breaking it. I then created a SOLUTION---a forearm selfphonecam holder--but have not pursued finding a manufacturer because SELFPHONES ARE EVIL TOOLS OF THE ILLUMINATI PIED PIPERS to Simon Says! sheeple to do evil things using the www/666 internet--like the BS Floyd-fake-excuse riots/lootings/vandalizings/murders.
I don't want to help sheeple use selfphones--they need to get off their immoral, lazy asses and monitor world events thru FULL SCREEN LAP/DESKTOP computers--not their tiny screen "IPODs" aka idiot pods. However, since we are not in SHTF yet--full societal collapse--cell phone grids are still up & working in a I dare say, "Normalcy Hits the Fan" (NHTF) situation so James Bond Citizens (JBCs) can use them as walkie-talkies for Home Defense (HD). Recently, I updated my invention to have a dry erase mini-board larger than the WEAR-N-WRITE and accept a small map section for air/land navigation. I'll reluctantly TactiSMART post my invention so the Pink Chinese can steal it since the BS American "capitalist" system doesn't work when the Illuminati hog up all the "capital" and don't want your inventions to make mankind better. Don't forget the NIHS weak egotism excuse, too!
I have dozens of inventions awaiting mass widget production (remember the BATTLESPORK?) but the so-called patriotic Americans supposedly wanting to make things are full of their smug, I'm rich-you're not excuses to sit on their asses and whine that Red China is beating us and we should go cheat and attack them militarily because we refuse to compete.
James Bond is REAL.
NOTES
https://propagandaprofessor.net/2019/06/25/the-great-horatio-alger-myth/
The Great Horatio Alger Myth
Strive and succeed. That’s the motto that gets hammered into Americans’ heads from the day they’re born. Work hard and you will be prosperous. It’s a credo that Americans have embraced wholeheartedly; after all, it’s the land of opportunity, right? So what better domain to operate under this simple formula that greater effort equals greater reward.
We have come to call this the Horatio Alger narrative, after the popular author who wrote a series of young adult “rags to riches” novels in which the hero, always a hardworking and honest youth, finally achieves good fortune. These cheesy turn-of-the-century books both embodied and propagated the popularity of the “Protestant work ethic” in the U.S. If you look beneath the surface, however, you see that things aren’t quite so simple.
First of all, if you examine more closely the Alger books themselves, you see that the stories aren’t quite as you might expect from the hype. They do not really involve underprivileged individuals building successful lives on their own efforts. Instead, the young protagonists get a leg up by somehow currying favor with older, already successful role models. This plot device, by the way, was drawn from Alger’s own life. Before he became an author, he was a minister who took an interest in befriending and mentoring youths in his flock. He lost that gig when it was discovered that he had been, um, getting a little too friendly with them.
A closer scrutiny of the narrative, in other words, betrays the truth about a common component of the myth: the persona of rugged independence has been greatly distorted. Independence is certainly an admirable quality, and some people possess it more than others. But the part of the myth that is really mythical is the notion that it’s possible to be a success (particularly in the financial sense, as the word success is almost always intended in America) without the aid of other people. Even the most independent entrepreneur in the world will not earn a dime without customers or clients to purchase his or her goods or services.
Many Americans, however, have been conditioned to think of prosperity as a [EDITOR: limited] pie, and when some people are served a slice, it subtracts from what other people get. [EDITOR: Zero Sum Thinking] Consequently, they look upon programs to assist the needy as a drain upon taxpayers rather than an investment that can benefit everyone. And they try to rationalize this attitude with the talking point that “handouts breed dependency” — unless, of course, they’re talking about “handouts” for the wealthy.
A sad corollary and side effect of the Horatio Alger myth is the attitude that people deserve whatever economic status they find themselves in. Thus the rich deserve to be rich (even the Walton family or the 45th White House Occupant, who’ve never had to work a day in their pampered lives), and the poor deserve to be poor — even homeless, shell-shocked veterans and people who have been plagued with medical bills and other misfortunes.
This has given rise to the myth of the “welfare queen”, the “welfare Cadillac”, and so on. The popular stereotype about recipients of public assistance is that they are lazy minorities who have become dependent on government intervention. In reality, most are white, are employed at least part time, are desperate to get off the dole, and stay on it only a short time. And the amount of your tax money that goes toward such programs is hardly a sliver in comparison to other budgetary allotments, some of which are far less benign and productive.
To observe how the Horatio Alger myth breaks apart when exposed to oxygen, all we need do is consider in a little more detail the life of the one person who is perhaps most often touted as its personification: Abraham Lincoln. We all know that he was born in a log cabin, had an impoverished childhood, was hardworking and dedicated and honest (actually, he wasn’t all that honest, but that’s another story) and eventually not only worked his way up to the world’s most prestigious position, but became what many consider the greatest leader in the nation’s history. All well and good. But there are other details about him that you don’t hear about quite so much.
As a young man, he lost his job and lost a race for the state legislature. The following year, his grocery business failed, incurring debts that took 15 years to repay. A couple of years later, he finally was elected to the legislature, but then he lost two races for Speaker of the House. A few years after that, he managed to get elected to Congress, but was defeated for reelection two years later. Then he lost a race for a land-office seat. He then lost two bids to be elected senator, and one bid to be vice-president. Finally, at age 51, he ran for president. And won.
Now on the one hand, Lincoln’s trajectory illustrates the importance of tenacity and dedication. So it’s understandable that it would be used to illustrate the axiom “try, try again.” BUT…suppose he had died at the age of 50? Do you think he would be remembered today? There’s not much to indicate he would be, and certainly he would not have been remembered as one of the nation’s greatest statesmen. In fact, his life up to that point was distinguished more by failure than by success.
Lincoln’s biography was boosted tremendously by the fact that, mostly out of sheer chance, his death was delayed by a few years. Yet even before he was catapulted into the history books, he still possessed those skills and traits that made him famous, even though he was then quite unknown. In other words, while hard work and character are admirable and productive, luck is also a big factor. How many other men and women have lived who possessed character comparable to Honest Abe’s and worked as hard as he did, but are now forgotten because they died before their efforts paid off?
None of this is to suggest that the Horatio Alger myth isn’t useful. Perhaps it is even essential. It’s certainly important, at least, to foster the attitude that hard work produces satisfaction and reward (even if the reward isn’t always monetary). It’s important to understand that effort is productive. [EDITOR: Stoicism wokes] But it’s also important to understand that there is not a direct, consistent, predictable correlation between the amount of effort and the amount of reward. It’s important to have empathy for those who are struggling, and at least occasionally, offer them a helping hand. The risk of having people become “dependent on a handout” isn’t nearly as real as the risk of having the next Abe Lincoln die unknown. [EDITOR: this is fuck-you Amerika today!]
Comments
Post a Comment